In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Farmers Friend experienced a surge in demand for their core product, caterpillar tunnel kits. However, this increase in sales led to significant challenges in inventory, production, and staffing due to quarantine protocols. At the height of the issue, orders were stacked outside, freight trucks were backed up, and unfulfilled orders resulted in up to $1.2 million in unearned revenue. Customer frustration was mounting due to missed lead times, and the company faced financial losses from canceled orders and transaction fees.
The primary goals of the improvement efforts were to reduce lead times and prevent continued risk exposure, while also increasing production capacity. At the same time, the team aimed to improve customer satisfaction and protect the business's reputation by ensuring that orders were fulfilled more efficiently and in a timely manner.
To address the challenges, the team adopted the mindset that lead times were a promise to customers, not an estimate, which created a sense of urgency and duty to meet expectations. To manage inventory uncertainty and mitigate risk, sales for certain items were temporarily turned off, and a sign-up list was created to ensure lead times were met and customers potentially retained.
A key element of the solution was the development of a dashboard to monitor output and manage backlog levels. Trigger points were set at various stages, such as implementing overtime when needed, cross-training employees to assist in other areas, opening a second production line, or turning sales off when necessary to prevent exceeding a four-week lead time. The second production line was modeled after 3M’s approach to meet future demand, ensuring the business was prepared for any unexpected surges in orders.
To improve workflow, the team used spaghetti diagrams to analyze and optimize the flow of materials and labor, eliminating pre-bundling and allowing work to be done in stages, which reduced motion and increased efficiency. Additionally, large quantities of materials were ordered to prevent future inventory shortages and prevent production lurch. Although this led to later challenges, such as defective cardboard cores from outdoor storage and increased liabilities.
Despite these efforts, the company hired approximately 15-20 employees to manage the workload, but ultimately, the issue was found to be more systems-based than workforce-related. This led to the difficult decision to let those employees go due to near insolvency before the systems improvements were fully realized.
Lead time, once as long as 6 weeks, was reduced to an average of 3 days, with a target of 1 week consistently.
Order fulfillment capacity increased from 30 orders per week to 50, with occasional peaks up to 70 orders per week.
Team morale improved significantly, and customer satisfaction rose as the team was able to meet demand and promise accurate lead times.
Monthly unearned revenue was reduced to an average of $200k, significantly lowering financial risks.
The importance of meeting lead time expectations cannot be overstated. This mindset shift helped improve customer trust.
Adding people doesn’t solve root problems. Focusing on systems and processes improved capacity without needing excessive hires.
By measuring capacity and tracking progress, the company was able to make informed decisions and improve accuracy in fulfilling orders.
Like 3Ms response to SARS prepared them for Covid, learning from past challenges can lead to better preparation for future demand surges.
Every member of the team contributed to the packing blitzes, from top leadership to the floor workers, making it a shared responsibility.
Unchecked sales can erode profit margins. When fulfilling orders becomes a risk, it’s better to pause sales rather than promise something that can't or may not be able to be delivered.
The fulfillment improvement effort was a challenging but ultimately successful initiative that significantly enhanced the company’s ability to meet demand while maintaining customer satisfaction. By focusing on process improvements rather than simply adding more staff, the team was able to reduce lead times from six weeks to just a few days, increase production capacity, and improve operational flow.
Although there were difficult decisions along the way, such as letting go of additional employees and dealing with inventory-related liabilities, the team’s ability to adapt, measure progress, and learn from past experiences was key to the success. These improvements not only ensured that the company could manage the increased demand brought on by the pandemic but also established systems that allowed for sustainable growth and better risk management moving forward.
The experience reinforced the importance of treating lead times as a promise, continuously measuring capacity, and learning from past challenges to better prepare for the future.
How would you have balanced the risk associated with pausing sales, inventory fluctuations and delays, and long lead times? How would you rank these in importance?
How would you respond to requests from shop floor workers to hire more help to handle demand?
How would you handle tension between teams who had to flex and felt that their departments were not appreciated and other departments were underperforming?
Do you see lead times as a promise or an estimate? Explain your thought process.
If you have any questions about increasing capacity to reduce lead time in any aspect of the business, or if you're curious about any additional details in the case study, I’d love to connect with you and offer insights at no charge. Whether you're exploring Lean for the first time or looking for ways to refine your current process, feel free to reach out with any questions – I'm happy to help!
If you’re looking for more in-depth support, such as analyzing your capacity data or developing a full-service plan tailored to your organization’s needs, I also offer consulting services for a fee. We can discuss your goals, identify challenges, and create a strategy to drive lasting improvements.
Don’t hesitate to reach out, and we’ll find a time to chat. Whether it’s a quick question or a more detailed discussion, I look forward to connecting with you!
Nick's company faced a persistent issue with shipping accuracy, particularly with high tunnel kits. Almost 2 out of every 10 orders had missing items, which led to frequent customer calls. This not only damaged the company’s reputation but also resulted in costly replacement shipping, service recovery costs, time spent handling customer issues, and delays in fulfilling new orders.
Customers were especially frustrated when they were ready to build their tunnel kits but lacked all the necessary parts. The problem was especially significant as farming is a business of timing, and delays could impact customers negatively in many ways. The company’s excellent customer service helped mitigate the issues, but the problem was costly and impacted both the business and the customer experience.
The goal of the project was to reduce the number of missing items in shipments, focusing on improving accuracy. Once the team understood that accuracy was at 88%, they set a target of achieving 99% accuracy. Improving shipping accuracy was a key metric for customers, and addressing this issue would not only enhance customer satisfaction but also streamline internal operations and reduce costs associated with costly corrections, replacement shipping, and customer service handling.
Initially, the team was working in the dark as they didn’t have clear data on the extent of the issue. Nick tasked the department leader with data mining from past orders to ascertain how often items were missing, which items were affected, and the frequency of these occurrences.
With the data collected, the focus shifted to improving internal quality control (QC). The team developed a list of possible root causes, including poor labeling, inaccurate packing guides, miscounting, and items being lost in transit. A QC checklist was created, and one person was assigned responsibility for inspecting orders. The goal was to catch issues before orders left the building and to conduct on-the-spot root cause analysis. For any orders that made it to the customer, they were considered QC issues, while those caught before they left the building were treated as process issues. The team also began taking pictures of every order to document whether missing items were on the pallet or lost in transit.
Weekly meetings with the manager and daily team meetings were held to discuss root causes, prioritize recurring issues, and ensure accountability. As the process developed, the team identified errors in their pick list software, improved labeling, and evaluated packing methods to reduce the likelihood of lost items during shipment. They also selected top-tier carriers to reduce the number of damaged pallets. While experimenting with pokayoke techniques, including using scales and weight to validate shipments, this was not fully developed but was considered a step in the right direction.
Key metrics were tracked using a spreadsheet dashboard, monitored weekly. Over the course of nine months, the team was able to consistently achieve 99% accuracy in shipping.
Customer service morale improved significantly as their workload lightened and they no longer had to handle frequent customer complaints. Customers no longer faced frustrating delays from missing parts and no longer had to purchase items from local hardware stores to complete their tunnel kits.
The team saved time and money by reducing rework, replacement shipping, and service recovery efforts. Despite challenges with delayed customer feedback (due to customers building their kits months after ordering), the team remained focused on preventing issues before the orders left the warehouse.
Relying on gut instinct alone was insufficient; tracking data and understanding systems were key to solving the issue.
The solution wasn’t in asking people to count better or focus more, but in improving the systems that supported them.
Spending more time with the team on the floor would have accelerated the identification of root causes and solutions.
Investing in an off-the-shelf Business Intelligence system could have improved data mining efficiency and reduced the risks of errors associated with the fragile spreadsheet system.
The team actively participated in the improvement process, growing in their ability to identify root causes and focus on process improvements.
By using control charts, we could have tracked the performance of shipping accuracy over time. The charts would have made it easier to identify when the process was going out of control and when improvements were actually making a difference.
Overall, the project was a huge success. Not only did the team learn a great deal about the root causes of the shipping issues, but they also improved systems that saved both the company and customers time and money. There were fewer customer complaints, and the morale of the team—particularly in customer service—improved as their workload became more manageable. Customers were no longer frustrated by missing parts, which were critical for their timely farming activities. The improvements resulted in a better customer experience and an enhanced reputation for the company.
How do you currently collect data? Once you collect the data, how are you using it to guide improvements?
Who should be responsible for process improvements? How might context impact who is responsible?
Would you ever set a goal for anything less than 100% or perfection? Explain your thought process.
Do you think that assigning one person QC responsibilities is a good approach? Explain your thought process.
What one action will you take after reading this case study?
If you have any questions about increasing accuracy in any aspect of the business, or if you're curious about any additional details in the case study, I’d love to connect with you and offer insights at no charge. Whether you're exploring Lean for the first time or looking for ways to refine your current process, feel free to reach out with any questions – I'm happy to help!
If you’re looking for more in-depth support, such as analyzing your accuracy data or developing a full-service plan tailored to your organization’s needs, I also offer consulting services for a fee. We can discuss your goals, identify challenges, and create a strategy to drive lasting improvements.
Don’t hesitate to reach out, and we’ll find a time to chat. Whether it’s a quick question or a more detailed discussion, I look forward to connecting with you!
Farmers Friend was struggling with sustaining 5S improvements, experiencing reversion where previously established standards would not be followed, areas would accumulate clutter, and improvements were forgotten or repeated. The lack of clear accountability and understanding of the 5S principles hindered long-term success.
Nick developed a custom 5S Assessment system using Google Forms and Sheets to track compliance and identify areas for improvement. The system was structured with clear inspection criteria, where each section of 5S (Sort, Set in Order, Shine, Standardize, and Sustain) was assessed with yes/no questions and scored. The tool allowed the inclusion of images, provided a transparent method of tracking results, and encouraged accountability.
The system was tested and refined with input from the Gemba Group, consisting of Nick, Mike, Brandon, Chris, and Dylan. Early challenges included inconsistent results due to fluctuating assessor participation and engagement, limitations of the digital system used, and lack of clarity for line workers. However, after debriefing and adjusting the strategy, the team started to see significant improvements. The results were shared in departmental reports and later presented in an all-hands meeting to communicate the goals and strategies for improvement.
Score Improvement: Compliance increased over 12 months from 40% to 86%.
First Quarter: 40%
Second Quarter: 57%
Third Quarter: 69%
Fourth Quarter: 79%
End of Year: 86%
The company saw improvements in workflow, including smaller batch sizes and enhanced Kanban card system efficiency. Out-of-stock items were reduced, shipping accuracy increased from 80% to 99%, and dock time dropped from seven days to one.
The shop floor developed a strong lean culture, but challenges persisted in non-manufacturing departments, such as customer service and tech, where lean principles faced resistance.
Greater alignment between leadership and departments was necessary for achieving even better results.
A stronger focus on on-the-floor leadership could have fostered better engagement and results.
Nick learned the importance of having direct conversations with leadership, including the CEO and other department leaders, to ensure better alignment.
After two assessments, Nick realized that investing in software sooner (like Safety Culture) would have improved implementation and results earlier.
High standards with present leadership should lead to accountability, which can include termination for non-compliance with 5S principles.
The 5S Assessment system was effective in increasing compliance, improving operational efficiency, and fostering a lean culture on the shop floor. However, ongoing challenges in organizational alignment and leadership engagement highlighted areas for future improvement. Nick’s experience emphasized the value of direct leadership involvement, the importance of investing in tools and systems that can streamline processes, and the necessity of high accountability standards to ensure short and long-term success.
How are decisions made in your organization? Majority Rule, Authority Decision, Voting, Autocratic Decision-Making, Consensus, etc.
What kind of growth is needed or expected in terms of speed?
What would be key benchmarks of success that you would want to see from implementing a 5S audit system?
What problems would you want a 5S audit system to solve for your organization?
Explain if you have a preference for 3S (Sort, Set in Order, Shine), 5S (Sort, Set in order, Shine, Standardize, Sustain), or 6S (Sort, Set in order, Shine, Standardize, Sustain, Safety). What is your reasoning for that preference?
Explain if you believe 5S audit systems are a necessary part of 5S.
What one action will you take after reading this case study?
If you have any questions about implementing a 5S audit system, or if you're curious about how it might benefit your organization, I’d love to connect with you and offer insights at no charge. Whether you're exploring 5S for the first time or looking for ways to refine your current process, feel free to reach out with any questions – I'm happy to help!
If you’re looking for more in-depth support, such as implementing a comprehensive 5S system or developing a full-service plan tailored to your organization’s needs, I also offer consulting services for a fee. We can discuss your goals, identify challenges, and create a strategy to drive lasting improvements.
Don’t hesitate to reach out, and we’ll find a time to chat. Whether it’s a quick question or a more detailed discussion, I look forward to connecting with you!